<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AUC Create World &#187; visualisation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://betweenthebuttons.net/createworld/archives/tag/visualisation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://betweenthebuttons.net/createworld</link>
	<description>A geekery of digital creatives ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 02:14:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>But is it art (and who cares)?</title>
		<link>http://betweenthebuttons.net/createworld/archives/52</link>
		<comments>http://betweenthebuttons.net/createworld/archives/52#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 07:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Green</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#cw09]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[createworld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visualisation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betweenthebuttons.net/createworld/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The first day of Create World presented to us a panel of image-making superstars, including renowned nature photographer Steve Parish,  and Eureka prize winning science photographer Phred Petersen (RMIT).</p>



<p>It was billed as a Visual-Art- interfaces-with-Scientific-Research event, but I&#8217;m not quite sure that we had time to get to the pointy end, you know where we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first day of Create World presented to us a panel of image-making superstars, including renowned nature photographer <a href="http://www.steveparish.com.au">Steve Parish</a>,  and <a href="http://www.rmit.edu.au/browse/News%20and%20Events%2FNews%2FGeneral%20news%2FScience%20and%20technology%2Fby%20date%2F;ID=x0jmrxxv6plz;STATUS=A">Eureka prize winning science photographer</a> Phred Petersen (RMIT).</p>
<dl class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 210px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><img class="   alignleft" style="border: 0pt none; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px;" title="Phred Petersen’s Blast Wave." src="http://mams.rmit.edu.au/jcw64n3jaclz.jpg" alt="Phred Petersen’s Blast Wave." width="200" height="147" /></dt>
</dl>
<p>It was billed as a Visual-Art- interfaces-with-Scientific-Research event, but I&#8217;m not quite sure that we had time to get to the pointy end, you know where we answer that question as to what the Arts-Science interface really entails. Mostly, we just oohed and aahed at lots of awesome graphics straight out of the science lab &#8211; water rippling in slow motion, frantic technicolour human cell imaging, patterns of shockwaves &#8230;.</p>
<p>Phred Petersen put it all modestly and matter-of-factly, constantly insisting that he was not an artist, and that structures in the natural world revealed themselves to be &#8216;far more beautiful&#8217; than anything than his own imagination might produce under its own steam. He is into scientific photography, he says, because it allows him to see things that he wouldn&#8217;t otherwise be able to see. And much of the time, what he sees, often by virtue of incredibly expensive, high speed cameras, is simply &#8216;cool&#8217;. No further critical comment needed, it&#8217;s just &#8216;cool&#8217;.</p>
<p>I guess it raises some interesting questions about how we define artistic endeavour. Just because you don&#8217;t create something entirely from the ground up doesn&#8217;t mean that  you&#8217;re not an artist. After all, don&#8217;t we consider <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Found_art">found art</a> a legitimate field of artistic expression? Admittedly, found art practitioners will often modify, frame, contextualise the pieces they pick up. But doesn&#8217;t one suspect that those scientific imagers are doing the same thing &#8211; framing, situating in space, colorizing, and so on &#8211; in ways that are irrelevant to the scientific data being communicated, and that just make for better visual appeal? So maybe they are artists after all. But what does it matter &#8211; the photos are cool.</p>
<p><em>Image: Phred Petersen&#8217;s prize-winning &#8216;Blast Wave&#8217;, taken from: </em><a href="http://mams.rmit.edu.au/jcw64n3jaclz.jpg">http://mams.rmit.edu.au/jcw64n3jaclz.jpg</a></p>
<p><em></em><em>Ian Green</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://betweenthebuttons.net/createworld/archives/52/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
